Playing tall or playing wide, which is better!? Most players start by building and advancing their empires in stellaris with a typical : expand, then build o. The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. By Obsidian Shadow. The best way to play is to have as close to zero empire size whilst having the biggest science income. Playing tall is using the minimal amount of worlds, rather then the minimal amount of systems. This guide is incredible. Stellaris Tall vs. The Hegemon is easily the best Origin in Stellaris, and with good reason. Since then I have won a few more times using a Megacorp. So really you will want to find some sort of mod that provides benefits to those with few planets. NB: this is system not planet. As I understand, the point is to focus on research and traditions and less so on economy, but I'm trying a tall run now and it feels like everything's sorta slow since my research speed is at 10, 7. It's that time again, the 4th big overhaul for Stellaris has arrived, which means that all tutorials can be thrown out of the window and it's time to start n. It also allows you to focus on building up your core planets MUCH more from my experience, since I can just keep to myself while my allies/defence stations act as. Megacorp is probably my favorite thing in Stellaris. OP, there currently is no such thing as a tall build for this game. 1 energy. With that being said, playing tall in Stellaris is a lot harder than you think! How, then, can you get started playing tall in this game? Keep reading to discover our comprehensive guide! Set Your Limits See moreHow to play tall? I thought the changes to unity, particularly the planetary ascension mechanic, would make it ideal for a corporate empire to play tall, so I gave it. 3 comments. It will be interesting to see just how far apart Tall and Wide empires get in Stellaris though. However, I am interested in playing tall, since maybe this is the best strategy for me. I explored my immediate area, only went after systems that were "behind" chokepoints (from an outside perspective), and tried to get the basic strategic resources (motes. With voidborne, you can build multiple habitats in a. This is going to be my updated take on the basic builds. This may promote a "tall" growth of your empire, certainly helped by the presence of the Ecumenopolis, however this is a strategy that still has to find its place in the Stellaris meta. It is a very rough start. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. For going tall, you really don't need it. The faster you can do it, the less likely other corps can get them from you. In just one year, that's 3600 minerals conserved. Stellaris is modelling a whole host of SciFi tropes while also being a 4X game (opposed to the previous two's grand strategy genre). Stellaris is probably the best paradox game to play tall because stellaris. ago. 3. Stellaris Real-time strategy Strategy video game Gaming. ago. Unless a lower setting is fine for the Tall. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. At the very beginning of the game you can get some pretty good growth by putting your homeworld into capacity bonus territory, but as your empire-wide population grows the pop growth penalty just gets bigger and bigger. You can also do this as a machine intelligence but its entirely a different strategy. Add a Comment. After a while, re-change your pops so that those on habitats get great specialist traits and those on planets get good worker traits. So a big issue with the proposed addition of sprawl penalties to pops (in addition to systems, planets and districts) is that it is a huge nerf to the tall strategy, which is bad since wide is already the clearly dominant strategy (since the tech/tradition penalty directly benefits "tall" play vs "wide" play, but is widely regarded as being. Currently, pretty much the whole galaxy is my vassals and also members of my hegemony, except for one who has been my ally since the very beginning. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. There's 2 ways to play Stellaris. As quill is trying to get 200 years of peace achievement. Making this a great strategy for beginners to try out. Tall is restricting yourself to playing with fewer colonies and avoiding outward expansion. ) Playing Tall is a very special type of empire. 0 has a severe unity bug) - when it comes to both unity and research, more planets is always better. With shattered ring, you get 3 big ring sections in your starting system, great for tall play. Totally viable. Fan demand for equally balanced tall playstyles has hindered game enjoyability. . The bonus of it is you can probably defend your entire space with one fleet. When I play tall, and only conquer like 10-12 systems, and find good chokepoints, and focus on tech and development on my worlds, I end up with 100s of each resource per month, and by midgame every non-FE empire is 'inferior' to me. In a sense, they behave like planets you can construct yourself,. And my understanding of it (as of everything else) shifts a bit all the time, so. 7. Any void dwellers build with militarist. Every game I'm like "okay in gonna find the nearest choke points and play tall" and never actually do unless I get boxed in. Tall/Wide are CIV terms that the community stole and then tried to apply them to this game and completely screwed everything up. Its the eternal question that decides how you’re going to play your game of stellaris and what you early strategy is going to be. Playing tall works. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. Start playing on easy mode in an empire that you don't like to play, then set up a goal like geting the worm to terraform your planets and then try to play as robotic ascencion, something stupid or boringly difficult. r/Stellaris. Tall means you really stack all you have onto a few systems. Often multiple playstyles apply and synergize. Use FPs (Frontier Outposts) to block alien Empire reach to your planet (s) and the spiral arm in question where you spawned. The benefits of playing tall are as follows: Smaller empires are easier to manage. I'd argue no, due to the nature of population growth and the general lack of bonuses for small empires. . Technically voidborn in a very small space is playing wide, in a very small space. What Stellaris Does Right, for now. This is really very unplayable for me, i hate playing wide, and playing tall I just. HopeFox • 6 yr. When I look at some people's screenshots here, I see that some have naval caps in the 300's and 400's at the same time as I'm playing (early 24th century). Since your research requirements go up per each planet you colonize I find for me personally that it is better to only colonize larger worlds (15 tiles or more minimum). . I believe the large consensus among Stellaris players who pay attention to meta is that, in 2. Sure, a 1000-pop tall empire with 25 planets/habitats isn’t big by Stellaris standards, but that’s still 500 billion people. RodHull (Banned) Apr 22, 2021 @ 2. That’s 350x the population of China with much more area and a much more productive and advanced economy not just capable of building highways and skyscrapers, but advanced megastructures and entire artificial worlds. ISO system juust flexible enough to accommodate both c. First things first; your ethics should be materialist. and also having a planet to grow pops on (and then relocate them home) lets you grow a lot faster. It made the rest of the game very easy, getting a quarter population boost and the large Gaia world, as well as a massive territory free for the taking. If you play habitats you can get more resources from jobs without actually taking up more space. In reality it would be just the same wide play, just with fewer systems. Stellaris "Tall" mainly means getting as much resources as possible out of a small(er) space. It is great for high difficulties because you don’t have to attack the really powerful empires and can get them to pathetic by mid to late game. The only way I can define Tall in Stellaris is when you focus heavily on science from day one to make your POP more efficient. Playing tall is a strategy among others, it's not really a playstyle as it can be in some other games (well, mostly Civ5 in fact, and it's really just another word for turtling). 0 making playing tall a viable strategy. Whether it be just one county or a small duchy, the player uses all of their resources to funnel a small area on the map. Okay, first things first, if you PLAN to play tall go for the pacifist build and just switch out later on. Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. habitats as well as branch offices contribute to empire size. Assuming your goal is to win, which version of Stellaris was playing "tall" a valid strategy of winning? Because in my experience, (I started around 1. If you want to play a game where Tall playstyle is possible, play Endless Legend. In previous patches, especially before 3. In Stellaris, it would be really nice if there was a way to convert to tall play after the game starts, because sometimes your start location just doesn't prevent peaceful expansion. Tall vs Wide. I really love stellaris and want to try something new, but run out of ideas, also Stellaris has great communityTall vs wide use to be about science before 2. If you want to play a Machine Empire with a special starting world, you could pick the origin that starts you on a Machine world. Playing tall was heavily nerfed with changes to habitats. If you can't open branch offices for various reasons probably nearby AI hives, megacorps, xenophobes etc use early game economy bro expand or whatever and reform into a normal empire soon ditching the megacorp part of the build. Weekly PSA's PSA- the definition of playing wide is disputed, and many people use systems as opposed to planets as the model in Stellaris. It doesn't stop people from trying to shoe-horn it into Stellaris, but it. You need to go wide to get more resources and fund a larger army. You get more and more ways to focus your power inward. for many many hours straight. also if you're mass vassalizing that's not really tall play, that's just playing wide with extra steps. Sadly, space gnomes have not been confirmed, so we'll probably be forced to play tall. !remindme 1 day. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…. It doesn't work in Stellaris (at least in 3. Everyone is talking about “playing tall” but what does that actually mean in Stellaris? Are we all on the same page about what it means?. Playing tall or playing wide, which is better!? Most players start by building and advancing their empires in stellaris with a typical : expand, then build out planets and other parts. Egalitarianism + fanatical spiritualism + corporation for unity. Tips on playing wide? So i am trying to play more wide and less tall but i seem to have a problem. Yeah, it would be nice if the game supported playing tall. Being able to work a wider variety of jobs is far more important than the small bonuses the other types of slavery get. This includes systems such as the Sanctuary ringworld system, the system with the planet Zanaam and any special systems in the DLC (if you have the appropriate DLC). But you're right. And it can help a lot of your species has traits like intelligent or strong to take advantage of the bonuses, every plus 5% can help your empire survive longer. Always play on max star count. Unyielding lets you support more Starbases, which means more room for Hydroponics buildings, which means more food without needing to devote pops to producing it. Generally, there are 3 strategies you can mix and match. Victoria 2 was released 12 years ago, and victoria 3 is set to be released this year. Agreeing with PsySom here. Megacorp is a way to be a massive galactic powerhouse as tall because with branches you aren't using pops for resources. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather. This is because it's more efficient to have one production-boosting building affect 10 buildings than 2. Turn a planet into an ecumenopolis and set them to work on whatever you need (alloys, unity, consumer goods) or research ring/relic world. But it’s basicaly giving yourself a handicap for little to no reason. Make sure you are the only megacorp (by force if necessary) and make a trade federation or hegemony (depends on what you want to accomplish) become custodian (not emperor. There are many, many ways to play a militarist build. Playing tall as Megacorp is very easy and you are an impossible Empire to conquer because defending your borders is very easy. Highly stable, unified group thats close proximity keeps together. Stellaris was released in 2016, and it's only been six years. . 29 comments Best [deleted] • 1 yr. 3 update damages the ability to play wide, going tall is the smarter play. Then again: No pops, no win in Stellaris. The guaranteed strategic resources is helpful if you end up not having any in your corner of space (plus it gives higher chances of researching those techs for extraction). [deleted] • 5 yr. The whole purpose of playing tall used to be to avoid going over admin cap which kept your research, campaigns, and leaders cheaper. The Modding Den is a server dedicated to Stellaris Modding invite to our discord server. This mechanic of diminishing returns leads to two distinctly different play styles, wide and tall. All strategies assume you are trying to get maximum pops & maximum jobs on every planet. Building slots don’t expand from population anymore and city districts do not expand them; so, every habitat will be a few slots big until end game. Tall empires. Playing tall is not only possible, it's insanely powerful and (on Insane), I am always the most powerful empire in the galaxy by 2400. CK2 took around 8 years until the release of ck3. 0 has brought massive changes to how buildings are acquired, how pops grow and how districts work. And size of empire directly influences size of your navy. Also, I have never played with catalytic treatment. ago. So for Tall vs Wide in Stellaris, your start location matters a lot more than your empire build. And it can help a lot of your species has traits like intelligent or strong to take advantage of the bonuses, every plus 5% can help your empire survive longer. Could you. Cap one or 2 worlds at a time, set food limit to 5k and munch your way to the diabetis throne. You'll have to resettle, buy slaves or aquire more pops later to fill this world. 273 upvotes · 38 comments. This is really very unplayable for me, i hate playing wide, and playing tall I just. More systems=more stuff. Base habitat, with the size modifier, will have maybe half population growth from size penalties. Sprawl exists but can be managed at any size. 0 making playing tall a viable strategy. 2. Stellaris is a game I fall in and out of love with every few months and one of this games biggest flaws and probably what stops me from playing it regularly is having to micromanage 50+ planets every few minutes to build homes and create jobs. Overlord has changed a bunch of things when it comes to vassals and such. Jun 14, 2021 2. 87 Badges. Even so, you still do want to expand towards your target, just for the influence. We will be (almost). Expand at all costs! Wide in general, less-wide if you intend to do an early war of conquest. OPS is an excruciatingly tall play-style, but I do promise you'll pick up interchangeable skills that'll enhance your tall play. You use the early bonuses to advantage early-mid game expansion and transitioning into a wide. I always run into economic defects, Overpopulation and being serounded by larger empire's. 8K 89K views 4 weeks ago Stellaris Tall Build Guide. I had 2 victories in approximately 360h of playtime. Noanamus Mar 6, 2017 @ 4:21am. Tall doesn't mean you can't expand. Empire size has changed a lot over the years in Stellaris. I usually play "tall" by keeping my empire rather small, and instead subjugating as. Having every planet in a system with a habitat or colony. walter. If you're going for clone ascendant, you really don't want to be slavers on top of that, otherwise you're just locking yourself to 5 planets until you research synthetics. Enslaving conquered populations is tricky and requires a lot of pop shuffling. Terraforming to be 100% habitable for your pops. . Conventional wisdom is that playing wide is easier than playing tall, but my experience has been the opposite. Wide and Tall isn’t a stellaris definition, it’s used in many strategy games. TLDR, I think tall isnt dead, it is just more gradient. Today I have the first new basic build in a while. 75% boost to the planetary designation on. This reduces the number of different buildings you expect to build on each planet. Even if we never get a way to truly play tall, we still need to fix the current pop growth model (dominated by how many worlds contribute their base 3. For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from. I too like to normally play wide, but I'll switch it up with a tall megacorp. Going into the fir. playing tall or wide doesnt matter if you play in singleplayer BUT playing tall in. Honestly you should know better too. There are a lot of very easy to make changes that would make the choices a lot more equal if not perfect. Wide players would probably be running more like +400% costs and +200% tech/unity costs (I consider myself a traditionally wide player though my recently completed Le Guin game was a bit more. 3 with the elimination of admin cap. If there was a way for even more primatives and most empires playing tall and maybe a few colonies, with most of their fleets coming from federations, then that would be a more true star trek scenario. Indentured Servitude is the best kind of slavery, as it has the fewest job restrictions. Playing tall is more viable now, there will be buildable habitats which are basically small planets and the new unity mechanic will also favour smaller empires. 0. Building Tall Pacifist Empire. So really it's up to you. The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. One thing you can watch out for is that each precursor has areas of the map where their events can spawn. On easy difficulties though, wide is better than tall most of the time. Imo the best definition of play wide is a lot of systems. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. all needs a big overhaul. HopeFox • 6 yr. Tall vs Wide in Stellaris isn't a dichotomy, but rather a spectrum from one extreme to the other. Playing tall has genuine benefits in terms of potential mid to late game expansion. ago. 0 wide was getting as many planets as possible while taking the large tech negatives from having those planets. My 2 cents: tall and wide is a bit nebulous. Introduced with the title's Utopia expansion, habitats act as a tool that enables playing tall. ago. Thanks. Worth noting that the "drag" on research from empire size is pretty much the most negatively impactful (mechanically-speaking) aspect of a galaxy-spanning empire (i. Third is that people will want a Bulwark, but probabably as a 1-planet minor vassal, in order to get significant starbase discounts (20%) that will also apply to planetary rings. ago The_Godfather69 The Definitive Guide For "How To Play Tall" In Stellaris Console Edition Video This video is my Guide for: How to Play Tall in Stellaris Console. Throughout my (noobish) playthroughs of Stellaris I have always tried to play wide. I've seen a lot of people point out that playing tall in Stellaris has often basically been synonymous with just playing suboptimally, since for a long time now it's basically just meant not expanding to fill as much space or colonize as many planets as you could fill, and thus collecting less resources, all while confering little to no benefit in. In terms of strong tall builds that actually perform well, there are basically only two: Habitat Spam, and the Nihilistic Acquisition Raider. It is how the terms have worked for the majority of games since I was paying by the minute to access the internet. Even though there are many reasons why players might want to play tall, Stellaris indeed lacks functionalities that provide incentives for tall play (unless you count the negative incentive of planet & pop management). 2 councillor traits out of 3 is good enough for me. Even a faction with a single city all game. There are a couple of problems with playing tall. 20 comments. This may be changing in 3. It does make sense in stellaris to play as a "Tall" empire. I have two flavours playing stellaris, super nice super diplomatic empire or devouring swarm. I cant play stellaris this weekend to try and min max this build, so monday I can give you a stronger suggestion. Currently in 2. To me, playing tall means investing resources in things that increase the efficiency of your pops, which allows you to produce roughly the. Equilibrius Coastal Raider. Playing tall has genuine benefits in terms of potential mid to late game expansion. It doesn't matter how enlightened your culture or how advanced your technology is because imperium's bloated army can burry yoy under sheer size of it's manpower and resources with guns outdated by ten thousand years. Tall v wide is a bit of a false construct in stellaris specifically (always has been). Playing tall is using the minimal amount of worlds, rather then the minimal amount of systems. So a big issue with the proposed addition of sprawl penalties to pops (in addition to systems, planets and districts) is that it is a huge nerf to the tall strategy, which is bad since wide is already the clearly dominant strategy (since the tech/tradition penalty directly benefits "tall" play vs "wide" play, but is widely regarded as being. 8 Archetype Play-stylespared to read, better leave. To add to this, both implemented systems of empire sprawl, both post and pre 3. R5: The Alderson disk origin (added by gigastructual engineering) is a really fun game if you want to play tall. hirtes Mar 29, 2020 @ 6:30am. You can have 1/3rd of the galaxy and only 20 colonies, or 15 sectors and 50 habitats. Empire size has changed a lot over the years in Stellaris. Now it could be said if your wide with a tall build you have succeed so can tank the drop in efficiency. Playing Stellaris and EU4 Links updated for new forum March 31, 2015 Download the Fix-it-Yourself Pack for HoI 1. 23. #12. Byzantine is a personal favourite of mine, and whilst playing tall admin sprawl is usually an issue. Pick Aptitude as your first tradition to get +1 trait. Top 1% Rank by size. Some good tall origins are shattered ringworld and voidborne. Learn to micromanage. 0, is quite annoying due to the new pop cap for large empires. For example, a well-placed machine uprising could kill the galactic emperor and end the imperium, or a rebellion could end up vassalizing its parent state, and forming its own bloc. We will use these. Generally it's not really practical to play tall without the Void Dwellers origin as you would need insane luck to have a good. 1. Assuming you play 2. It was never viable, and it's not even possible now with the new empire size changes. I would say the same happens playing tall. There are a few common Playstyle types and each type will face similar issues regardless of how the galaxy was created. I really hope this video helps out everyone and thank you for watching! Nice to see some general coverage on the Tall Playstyle which arent specific Builds. Other good tradition trees for Void Dwellers include Domination (more influence and housing), Prosperity (more minerals, more specialist output, another building slot). One last tip about resettling pops to take ruler jobs: with slaver guilds, you may have to resettle 3 pops total to fill 2 ruler jobs on a newly conquered planet. Though to be honest, it doesn't really change my strategy in Stellaris all that much. Spreading all over the map is playing wide. It is how the terms have worked for the majority of games since I was paying by the minute to access the internet. . A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…The main problem is that Stellaris is a game of resources and pops are the most precious one, tall empires are awful in those regards and they also run the risk of lagging behind in the tech department which is bad. Unlike Civ, in Stellaris "tall" isn't about same output from fewer (but more developed) planets. First things first; your ethics should be materialist-authoritarian-militarist or fanatic materialist-militarist. The pop growth bonus in particular is also augmented by the bonuses of xenophobe, for a possible 30% base pop growth. This is in part due to victory conditions which allow a "tall" strategy to work throughout the game, but also because you can leverage your "tall" advantages into a temporary tech advantage at the right times to break out as a large conqueror -- you don't need to. I played Stellaris after the release, but that is long time ago and since EU4 became "RTS grand strategy with historical flavour, too streamlined mission trees for some countries and way too RNG-dependent in some cases", I would like to give Stellaris a shot. Playing tall will give you a hefty chunk of feeling like a plotter, a devious schemer who carefully plans his eventual ascension to near godhood. Paradox, Please Let Us Play Tall. Rather there is a gradient from "more wide" to "more tall" without any hard defining point where you stop being one and become the other. While Tall empires aren’t currently competitively viable, there are some features that lean towards a tall playstyle, and can be used as starters, points for praise, or references for further development. With the changes made in 3. For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from. Play fanatic pacifist,Use megacorp only in early game,After 3rd civic slot,Convert to democracy,Use Functional Architecture,Beacon of Liberty,Meritocracy. Toggle signature “The middle of the road is all of the usable surface. Since you dont have many planets, you cannot match the natural pop growth of wide empires. (Not super-tall though, as in one planet, but only 8 planets and about 16 systems at present. Method 1: Find a local AI, preferably one that is considerably more powerful, and between you and the baddies. Playing 'Tall' runs counter to paradox game design in a general way. 2; Reactions: Reply. As a long time Crusader Kings 2. The 3. Go for Bio-Ascension for cloning vats. I'm considering turning down habitable worlds. Wide. In a perfect run you would just grow large nough to start the vassalisation chain and then even shrink yourself a bit if over 100. 8 no DLC. Playing tall is more viable now, there will be buildable habitats which are basically small planets and the new unity mechanic will also favour smaller empires. r/Stellaris. | Paradox Interactive Forums. True you can make them larger, but then that's 2 ascension perks as opposed to one. Wide means you have more variety of planets and has its own fun to it. They now cost twice as much and are roughly half as effective as they used to be. Habitats are incredibly bad now. Option A is to build up your internal economy, with any commercial or trade agreements being bonuses to your own production. You can abandon colonies by resettling the last pop to another planet, but it costs 200 influence to do so. Currently, playing tall is neither fun nor competitive if you ask me. The 0,1 penalty is the +10% penalty per system other than the first one. Pick the difficulty level that matches the challenge you want to face. Step 1. There is no such thing as “playing tall” in Stellaris. Report. Megastructures aren't the only way to succeed when playing tall. I would say going tall is even more viable now. 8 tall isn't as viable anymore, can anyone give me a fleshed out strategy/perspective?If you're playing wide that sprawl is very low. You can play a faction which only ever has 1 city, but everything is concentrated in this one city. Playing tall is a long-term strategy, so players should generally start using it. In Stellaris, you don't make that choice. 2. They would be also wrong. We have another 2. . A Dyson Sphere is a vital part of a very tall empire, and the Science Nexus can similarly propel you centuries ahead of the pack when playing a very compact empire. 48. Best. The upcoming 3. Until now, playing “wide” and securing as much territory as possible was considered the only way to stay competitive with rival Empires. self. for civics, mechanist is pretty good, syncretic evolution is great too, technocracy is ideal. With the Hegemon, you will get 2 AI-powered allies who will do whatever you wish early into. Tall gameplay does not exist in Stellaris. r/Stellaris • How does playing tall work?Stellaris Tall vs Wide is total number of colonies / habitats in general. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. After that take the angler civic, agrarian idyll and when you get the third one take catalytic converter as thats key to the whole build. The softcap, even under the initial 3. Beginner's guide to Stellaris.